Review this 90-second patient- and referrer-facing animation about renal histotripsy.

Watch page: https://nyu-histotripsy-kidney.pages.dev/
Landscape MP4: https://nyu-histotripsy-kidney.pages.dev/nyu-histotripsy-kidney.mp4
Captioned vertical MP4: https://nyu-histotripsy-kidney.pages.dev/nyu-histotripsy-kidney-vertical.mp4
Narration transcript: https://nyu-histotripsy-kidney.pages.dev/transcript.txt
Clinical sources and limits: https://nyu-histotripsy-kidney.pages.dev/sources.txt
Timestamped video stills: https://nyu-histotripsy-kidney.pages.dev/review-stills.jpg

First state whether you could watch the full video and hear its audio. If you cannot access either, say so and ask me to upload the MP4. Do not imply that you watched motion or heard narration if you only read the transcript or viewed stills.

Assess: anatomical accuracy; water coupling and ultrasound targeting; a bubble cloud confined to the focus; treatment of the mass plus a planned margin; mechanical, nonthermal tissue breakdown; the distinction between a fluid-filled treated area and the explicit fluid-hidden illustration; and the Later time jump before possible resorption. Check for unsupported claims about efficacy, safety, renal authorization, availability or recovery. Verify proposed medical corrections against primary sources.

Also assess patient-level clarity, narration and pronunciation, pace, visual continuity, text and caption readability on a phone, and the end card. Separate factual errors from preferences.

Return: (1) a brief overall assessment; (2) a timestamped table with severity P0/P1/P2, observed problem, why it matters, and a concrete fix; (3) the five most useful changes in priority order; and (4) any revised narration, with a source for each added factual claim. P0 means a factual or serious visual error that must be fixed before sharing; P1 materially improves clarity; P2 is polish. Note which findings you could not verify. Do not invent statistics or guarantee results.